
The political heat in Kasipul has reignited after commentator Philip Aroko raised new questions about how tallying was conducted during the recent electoral exercise. Speaking during a livestream shared on Facebook, Aroko insisted that the entire process felt “all tech, no touch” — a statement that has sparked intense public debate.
Aroko questioned whether the KIEMS kits, designed to enhance transparency and efficiency, may have played a decisive role in the outcome. His remarks have prompted supporters and critics alike to weigh in on whether technology strengthened or complicated the electoral process.
“Everything happened too clean, too digital, too fast. Did the KIEMS kits decide the winner?” Aroko asked, calling for clarity from electoral officials.
The video that ignited the conversation is available in the comments section of the original post.
Community Reactions
Some residents argue that Aroko’s concerns highlight long-standing issues surrounding trust in digital systems used during elections. Others, however, insist that the technology helped eliminate human interference and reduced opportunities for manipulation.
Officials Yet to Respond
Election officials in the region have not issued a formal response to Aroko’s claims. However, insiders maintain that KIEMS kits are designed to verify voter identity and transmit results securely — not influence or alter vote counts.
Aroko’s Message Gains Traction
The video continues to gain momentum on social media, with many calling for increased transparency on how digital tools are used in tallying. Whether Aroko’s remarks will prompt an official explanation or remain a spark in the larger political discourse is yet to be seen.
Discover more from NMtv
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
